In theory, this all sounds like you're asking the right questions. But the key assumption of Part 3 (and perhaps the others) is that AI remains at the level it is today. Changing our educational system is a long road - decades, at least. Instead, AI will gobble up the experts' roles too, far sooner than we might anticipate. And then gobble up the firms themselves. Then what? Will AI truly make progress beyond the existing market systems? What will the role of any human be?
It's not so much a question of what to do, but where is the puck truly heading, how fast, and can anyone skate fast enough to get in front of it.
Agree, and the slow speed of change in the educational system is frustrating to me, as an insider. But we have no option but to accelerate change and transform business school education. What I am going to suggest in Part 3 is a dual-track structure that can create a disruptive design within a legacy organization. Stay tuned!
In theory, this all sounds like you're asking the right questions. But the key assumption of Part 3 (and perhaps the others) is that AI remains at the level it is today. Changing our educational system is a long road - decades, at least. Instead, AI will gobble up the experts' roles too, far sooner than we might anticipate. And then gobble up the firms themselves. Then what? Will AI truly make progress beyond the existing market systems? What will the role of any human be?
It's not so much a question of what to do, but where is the puck truly heading, how fast, and can anyone skate fast enough to get in front of it.
Agree, and the slow speed of change in the educational system is frustrating to me, as an insider. But we have no option but to accelerate change and transform business school education. What I am going to suggest in Part 3 is a dual-track structure that can create a disruptive design within a legacy organization. Stay tuned!